Dismissed

G.Durai, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Nov 2014WP/29035/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition seeking writ of mandamus against State officials. The court directed the fourth respondent to dispose of a representation within one week via a speaking order. The writ petition was dismissed, connected MP closed, and no costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Directed the fourth respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation by a speaking order within one week. No costs awarded.

G.Durai, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07-11-2014

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.29035 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 G.Durai President Village Forest Council Reddimaniyakaranur Salem Taluk, Salem District .. Petitioner vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Secretary Forest Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 2.The Chief Conservator of Forests “Panagal Buildings” No.1, Jennis Road Saidapet, Chennai 600 015 3.The District Collector Salem District Salem 4.The District Forest Officer Salem District Hasthampatty, Salem District 5.The Forest Ranger (South) Salem District Hasthampatty, Salem District 6.A.Rangasami 7.P.Palanisamy 8.N.Ponnusamy .. Respondents

¶7

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take action against the respondents 6, 7 and 8 on the basis of the written representation of the petitioner dated 3.11.2014, and consequently, directing the respondents 1 to 5 not to divert the flow of water from Therppalli Odai to Oothukinaru Eri (Lake), situated within the Kanjamalai Reserve Forest at Reddimaniyakaranur Village, Salem Taluk, Salem District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent : Mr.S.T.S.Moorthy Government Pleader for RR,3 Mr.M.K.Subramanian Special Government Pleader for RR2, 4 & 5

¶9

ORDER

¶10

(Order of the Court was made by THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶11

On hearing the learned Counsel for parties, we consider it appropriate that the fourth respondent will dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 3.11.2014, by a speaking order within one week of the receipt of the order. 2.The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected MP is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nsv 1.The Secretary,State of Tamil Nadu Forest Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 2.The Chief Conservator of Forests “Panagal Buildings” No.1, Jennis Road Saidapet, Chennai 600 015 3.The District Collector Salem District Salem 4.The District Forest Officer Salem District Hasthampatty, Salem District 5.The Forest Ranger (South) Salem District Hasthampatty, Salem District + 1 cc to Mr.K. Selvaraj, Advocate SR.52961 + 1 cc to Special Government Pleader Sr.52820 + 1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.53067

¶12

AK(CO)

¶13

W.P.No.29035 of 2014

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

EU 13.11.14

G.Durai, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Durai, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Saravanan Vs The District Collector

K.K.Ramesh, Vs The Government of India

Sri Gaudiya Math Devotees Vs Sri Sachdananda Brahmachari

S.Dorairaj, Vs The Central Board of Film

K.K.Ramesh Vs Mohan Verghese Chunkath

The Tiruvarur District Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep. by