report to the Tahsildar, Kallakurichi, vide his letter, dated 7.8.1993. In spite of the several recommendations made in favour of the petitioner, by the various authorities, the 6th respondent had issued a show cause notice to the petitioner, dated 24.1.2009, asking the petitioner to show cause as to why his services should not be terminated, as he had failed to produce the community certificate showing that he belongs to Konda Reddy community. While so, the third respondent, vide proceedings, dated 21.5.2009, had rejected the claim made by the petitioner. The petitioner had filed an appeal against the said order, before the second respondent, vide letter, dated 15.6.2009. After several rounds of litigations and in spite of the petitioner producing a certificate issued in favour of one of his relatives, namely, C.Ramalingam, and the statement showing his relationship with the said person, the third respondent had rejected the request of the petitioner stating that he does not not belong to Konda Reddy' community, a Scheduled Tribe community. In such circumstances, the petitioner had preferred the present writ petition before this court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
