Disposed

B. Ramachandran v. The Secretary to the

Madras HC17 Sept 2014WP/22491/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a Writ of Mandamus directing the Transport Corporation and Government officials to recalculate retirement benefits based on a petitioner's representation. The High Court directed the respondents to consider the representation on merits within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2014 on merits and pass orders within eight weeks.

B. Ramachandran Vs The Secretary to the — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.09.2014

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN

¶5

W.P.No.22491 of 2014

¶6

B.Ramachandran .. Petitioner

¶7

..vs..

¶8

1.The Secretary to the Government, Transport Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.

¶9

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam Ltd), Kumbakonam.

¶10

3.The Selection Grade Assistant Manager, Provident Fund Division, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam Ltd), Kumbakonam.

¶11

4.The Deputy Manager (Accounts and Auditing), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam Ltd), Kumbakonam. .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents for fresh calculation for retirement and monitory benefits and differ in the basic pay based on the representation of the petitioner dated 10.02.2014.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kasinatha Bharathi

¶14

For respondents : Mr.A.Kumar, Spl.Govt.Pleader

¶15

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Considering the scope of prayer sought for in the Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2014 on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-
Asst. Registrar(CS III)
Dt.23/09/14
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar.
asvm
To
1.The Secretary to the Government,
Transport Department,
Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation (Kumbakonam Ltd),
Kumbakonam.

¶19

3.The Selection Grade Assistant Manager, Provident Fund Division, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam Ltd), Kumbakonam. 4.The Deputy Manager (Accounts and Auditing), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam Ltd), Kumbakonam. 5.The Selectio Grade Assistant Manager, Provident Fund Division, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam Ltd), Tiruchirappalli. +1cc to Mr.V. Kasinatha Bharathi ,Advocate SR.No.44557 +1cc to Govt. Pleader SR.No. 44832 KU(CO) ka 23/09

¶20

W.P.No.22491 of 2014 17.09.2014

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B. Ramachandran v. The Secretary to the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B. Ramachandran v. The Secretary to the

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Palanisamy, Vs the District Manager

A.Mathiyazhagan Vs Elangovan

S.Madhavan Vs M.Vijayakumar I.A.S

N.Velayutham Vs The Managing Director

Rajasekar Vs the Chief Engineer/

K.Murugan, Vs Government of Tamilnadu