The writ petitioner is the appellant. The appellant filed W.P.No.9766/2010, challenging the order of termination dated 28.09.1998, terminating him on medical grounds, passed by the second respondent and his subsequent order dated 16.06.2000 insofar as appointing him as fresh entrant in a pay scale lower than that of Mechanic, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1955 (in short "Disabilities Act") and consequently directing the respondents to treat his services to be a continuous one right from the date of his initial appointment in the year 1974, pay arrears of difference in salary between the pay scale of Mechanic and in the Helper (Technician) pay salary for the period from 28.09.1998 till the date of his reinstatement on 27.06.2000. The said writ petition, after contest, was disposed of by setting aside both the orders of the second respondent with a further direction that for calculating the payment of terminal benefits, the services rendered by him from the year 1974 till the date of his retirement on 30.06.2010, shall be taken into account; however, he is not entitled to pay protection and the pay of the petitioner in the post of Helper has to be fixed by taking into account the earlier service rendered by him. The writ petitioner, aggrieved by the latter portion of the above said order, has filed this writ appeal.
