Bose v. P.Manimuthu
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal challenging a decree directing restoration of a channel was disposed of. The court accepted that the channel had been restored per an earlier order and delivery effected. The appeal was dismissed without costs as the dispute was resolved.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 17.04.2014
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
S.A. (MD)No.547 of 2013
Bose ... Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.P.Manimuthu
2.The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District.
3.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Rep.by its District Collector,
Sivagangai. ... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be allowed to set aside the lower appellate court decree directing restoration of a channel.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bose
- respondent
P.Manimuthu
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District
- respondent
The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its District Collector, Sivagangai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court