G.Balakrishnan v. K.Jayalakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Second Appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear or provide representation despite prior listing for dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non - prosecution due to absence of appellants' representation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 09-08-2010
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN
Second Appeal No.866 of 2010
1.G.Balakrishnan 2.K.Sigamani .. Defendants/Appellants/Appellants Versus K.Jayalakshmi .. Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.08.2009 passed in A.S.No.12 of 2008 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge of Tambaram confirming the Judegement and Decree dated 10.09.2008 passed in O.S.No.341 of 2007 by the learned District Munsiff, Tambaram.
For Appellants : No appearance J U D G M E N T
This Second Appeal was listed under the caption "for Dismissal", since there was no representation on behalf of the appellants, on earlier occasion, i.e., on 06.08.2010. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/Asst.Registrar /True Copy/ Sub.Asst.Registrar
arr To 1. The Subordinate Judge, Tambaram 2. The District Munsiff, Tambaram
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Balakrishnan
- appellant
K. Sigamani
- respondent
K. Jayalakshmi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court