the defendants to encumber or alienate the properties till the disposal of the suit. The trial Court by an order dated 06.02.2014 has granted an ad interim injunction till 24.02.2014 and to comply with Order 39 Rule 3(a) of C.P.C. Since the respondents 1 and 16 filed a memo stating that they have not complied with Order 39 Rule 3(a) of C.P.C., the interim order granted on 06.02.2014 is suspended till 06.03.2014. Then the matter was posted on 06.03.2014, on which, the trial Court has held that a memo filed along with E.C. copy shows that one part of suit properties was alienated by R35 to third party and hence, directed both the parties to maintain the status-quo till 21.03.2014, against which, the present revision petition has been preferred by the 1st and 16th defendants/revision petitioners. To substantiate his arguments, the learned counsel relied upon para-13 in the decision reported in AIR 2000 SC 3032 (A.Venkatasubbiah Naidu v. S.Chellappan and others) and submits that once the party obtained interim exparte order and he has not complied with the provisions under Order 39 Rule 3A of C.P.C., he is not entitled any benefits of the same. Hence, he prayed for allowing the revision petition.
