suit, it is not for this court, at this juncture, to consider the contention as the issued already attained finality by dismissal of SLP against the said judgment. Therefore, the contention by the petitioner that still he has got remedy before this court by filing review petition is only hypothetical. As on date, the review petition has not been filed. Secondly, the contention of the petitioner regarding specific performance of the agreement was already negatived and attained finality. With regard to the landlord and tenant relationship is concerned, the petitioner himself admitted that Mr.J.Mariadoss was the owner and he only inducted him as tenant for 500 sq.ft. Since there was a dispute with regard to the payment of rent, the petitioner filed RCOP No.2595 of 1993 under Section 8 (5) of the Act and got order to deposit amount on 18.08.1993. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner was inducted only as a tenant. Unless his position gets changed by virtue of the sale deed executed by the owners or by virtue of decree passed by the competent court, his position continues only as a tenant and not otherwise.
