J.Murugan v. Sumathi
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal revision petition, the Madras High Court reduced the maintenance amounts payable by the petitioner-driver to 3,000 for his wife and 2,000 for his minor child.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to pay 3,000 per month to wife and 2,000 per month to minor child effective from the date of this order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.09.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM
Crl.R.C.No.365 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
J.Murugan ... Petitioner/Respondent
vs 1.Sumathi 2.M.Balakrishnan (Minor) represented by R1 ... Respondents/Petitioner
Criminal Revision filed under section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in M.C.No.7 of 2009 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate I, Poonamallee and set aside the order dated 06.05.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.M.Rahamath Ali For Respondents: No appearance
****** O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to pay the fixed amount of maintenance to his wife and minor child.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
J.Murugan
- respondent
1.Sumathi
- respondent
2.M.Balakrishnan (Minor)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court