Allowed

P.Rangaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Feb 2014CRL OP(MD)/2634/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed anticipatory bail to the petitioners charged with offences under Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(ii) of the IPC, imposing conditions regarding daily police appearance, personal bond, and court appearance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest subject to conditions including personal bond and daily police appearance.

P.Rangaraj Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Thirteenth day of February Two Thousand Fourteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.2634 of 2014

¶6

1 P.RANGARAJ

¶7

2 (*)P.SASI KUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 & 2

¶8

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOLLIDAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 32 of 2014. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S.A.CHANDRAKUMAR Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C, in Crime No.32 of 2014, seek anticipatory bail.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners said to have assaulted the de-facto complainant and due to that, the de-facto complainant had sustained a simple injury.

¶16

Learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that the defacto complainant sustained simple injury and he was discharged from the hospital.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(crl. Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials available on record.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest

¶19

or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV,

¶20

Trichy and on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 11.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

¶21

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶22

sd/-

¶23

13/02/2014

¶24

(*)Cause title amended as per the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 05.03.2014 and Made in MP(MD)No.1 of 2014 in Crl OP(Md)NO.2634 of 2014)

¶25

/ TRUE COPY /

¶26

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

TO (*)To be Substituted order already despatched 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV,TRICHY 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TRICHY 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOLLIDAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.A.CHANDRAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.9354 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.2634 of 2014 Date :13/02/2014 gdr 14.02.2014 2p/6C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Rangaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Rangaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malarmani Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthaiah Vs the Inspector of Police

Govindaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Saleem Mohamed Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

P.Ganesan @ Mottulu Ganesan Vs the Inspector of Police