Petition for anticipatory bail dismissed as the petitioner counsel endorsed its withdrawal. No substantive ruling on the Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer was delivered as the case was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Saturday, the Eighteenth day of October Two Thousand Fourteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM
CRL OP(MD) No.18036 of 2014 LAXMI ..PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs.
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TEIMPLE POLICE STATI9ON, RAMESWARAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. CR. NO. 110 OF 2014. ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.SUNDARA PANDIAN Advocate
For Respondent : Mrs.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/-
18/10/2014 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO
1 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.18036 of 2014 Date :18/10/2014 PBK 29/10/2014 ::1P-3C:
1 provisions across 1 enactments
LAXMI
STATE RE.INSPECTOR OF POLICE
G. Chokalingam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
