Allowed

Bakiaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Sept 2014CRL OP(MD)/16930/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused in a police complaint involving sections of IPC 294(B), 323, 324, and 506(ii). The court considered the release of the injured as a factor before imposing standard bond and appearance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail upon arrest or before the Magistrate, subject to a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions of daily police appearance for one week.

Bakiaraj Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Seventeenth day of September Two Thousand Fourteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.16930 of 2014

¶6

BAKIARAJ

¶7

... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.4

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP.BY

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SRI RANGAM, ( L & O) POLICE STATION, TRICHY, TRICHY CITY. CR. NO 524 OF 2014. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S.M.PITCHAI MUTHU Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioner is the A4 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294 (B), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.524 of 2014, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive, the accused abused the de-facto complainant and assaulted him with hands and also threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences.

¶17

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

¶18

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

¶19

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharge from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

¶20

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Trichy and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of one week and thereafter as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶21

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

¶25

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III,TRICHY.

¶26

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.

¶27

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶29

SRI RANGAM, ( L & O) POLICE STATION, TRICHY, TRICHY CITY.

¶30

+1. CC to M/S.M.PITCHAI MUTHU Advocate SR.No.52845

¶31

CRL OP(MD) No.16930 of 2014

¶32

RG.18.09.2014 2P.6C.

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Bakiaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bakiaraj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thangamani Vs the Inspector of Police

Manikandan Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police

Perumal Vs the Inspector of Police

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police

Ravanan Vs the Inspector of Police