Allowed

Faritha v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC23 Apr 2014CRL OP/8424/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to register an FIR and file a charge sheet based on a complaint of an accident. The Court held a cognizable offence was made out and directed the police to register a case and investigate.

What did the court decide?

Directed the first respondent police to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law.

Faritha Vs the Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2014) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 23.04.2014

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.8424 of 2014

Faritha

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.State represented by The Inspector of Police J-6 Police Station Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041.

¶10

2.Ms.Sathya Bama The Sub-Inspector of Police J-6 Police Station Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041.

¶11

3.The Inspector of Police (Crime) J-6 Police Station

¶12

Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041. ... Respondents

¶13

Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, praying to direct the first respondent to register FIR against accused and take necessary action on petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2014 and file a charge sheet in appropriate forums.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Murali

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.V.Arul,

¶16

Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the first respondent to register FIR against accused and take necessary action on petitioner's complaint dated 04.03.2014 and file a charge sheet in appropriate forums.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the occurrence was taken place on 04.03.2014 at 2.15 p.m and the petitioner has produced the Accident Register copy issued by AB Casualty, Government Royapettah Hospital, Chennai.

¶22

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) representing the respondents submits that no case is registered till now on the complaint given by the petitioner on 04.03.2014.

¶23

In the above circumstance, since congnizable offence is made out, the first respondent police is directed to register a case on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner on 04.03.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law.

¶24

This Criminal Original Petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-V)
Dated: 30 .04.2014
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mra
To
1.The Inspector of Police
J-6 Police Station
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041.
2.Ms.Sathya Bama
The Sub-Inspector of Police
J-6 Police Station
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041.
3.The Inspector of Police (Crime)
J-6 Police Station
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041.
4.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Madras.
1 cc to Ms.P. Murali, Advocate, Sr. 19412
Crl.O.P.No.8424 of 2014
SK (CO)
kk 30/4

¶25

Crl.O.P.No.8424 of 2014

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Faritha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faritha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Kanchanamala Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Bhaskar Vs Mrs.Uma Bhandari

Ramesh Vs the Inspector of Police

P.a.Krishnappa Vs a.Raghu

Dr.D.Prabhu Srinivasan Vs Dr.G.Ramaprabha

Prita Rachel Vs the Commissioner of Police