Dismissed

M.Mahendran v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Dec 2014CRL OP/7349/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a Cr. O.P. under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings. As the charge sheet was filed and investigation completed, the Government Advocate urged dismissal. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

M.Mahendran Vs the Inspector of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:16.12.2014

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.7349 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010

¶6

1.M.Mahendran
2.Murugan .. Petitioners
.. Vs ..
1.State through
The Inspector of Police,
S11, Tambaram Police Station,
In Crime No.1244/2009,
St.Thomas Mount,
Chennai.
2.K.Vadivammal .. Respondents
Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure praying to call for the records in Crime
No.1244 of 2009 on the file of the first respondent and quash the
same.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For 1 st
Respondent : Mr.D.Sivaramkumar
Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)
For 2nd
Respondent : No Appearance
ORDER
This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure to quash the criminal proceedings relating to
the case in Crime No.1244 of 2009 on the file of the first
respondent police.

¶7

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation for the petitioner. However, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) has submitted that in so far as the case in Crime No. 1244 of 2009 is concerned, investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has also been filed on the file of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram and the same was taken on file in C.C.No.367 of 2011 and therefore, he has urged this Court

¶8

to dismiss the petition as infructuous since the charge sheet has been filed.

¶9

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2010 is closed.

¶10

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
cla
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
S11, Tambaram Police Station,
In Crime No.1244/2009,
St.Thomas Mount,
Chennai.
2.The Judicial Magistrate,
Tambaram.
3.The Special Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
CRL.O.P.No.7349 of 2010
RBD(CO)
PMK.9.1.2015

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Mahendran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Mahendran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Dhanalakshmi Vs K.Senthamarai

A.Vedharethinam Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Leena Vs Sub Inspector of Police

J.Sumathi Vs R.Narasimharajan

Mrs.D.Akila Vs the Inspector of Police

C.Velumani Vs the State by