Dismissed

Kadhirvel v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC17 Oct 2014CRL OP/27233/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought a direction to the Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell to register a case. The Court found that a case (Crime No.82/2014) was already registered on the relevant complaint dated 16.07.2014, rendering the petition baseless, and dismissed it.

What did the court decide?

The petition seeking direction to register the case was dismissed as a case was already registered.

Kadhirvel Vs the Superintendent of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 17.10.2014

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU

¶5

Crl.OP No.27233 of 2014

¶6

P.Kadhirvel ...Petitioner

¶7

Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 2.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell, Villupuram District. ...Respondents Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the second respondent to register the case and to take necessary action against the above mentioned persons in accordance with law on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 16.07.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Rajesh For Respondent : Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶8

Seeking a direction to the second respondent to register the case and to take necessary action against the proposed accused in accordance with law on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 16.07.2014, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

¶9

2.This petition has come up today for admission. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents and I have also perused the records carefully.

¶10

3.It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents that a case has been registered in Crime No.82/2014 on the basis of the complaint of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner dated 16.07.2014. The said statement is recorded.

¶11

4.In view of the above statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, nothing survives in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

¶12

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(T&P)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
jbm
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram District, Villupuram.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell,
Villupuram District.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
1 CC to Mr.H.Rajesh, Advocate SR.No.49967
Crl.OP No.27233 of 2014
BVR (CO)
PSI (02.11.2014)

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kadhirvel v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kadhirvel v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Murugesan, S/O.P.Rasu, Vs the Inspector of Police(Crime)

R.Padmanaban Vs Srimathi Parameswari

Mr.Gallalappa Vs M/S.Ganga Finance

P.Paramasivam Vs Shanmugasundaram

M.Krishnan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

M.a.Panchatcharam Vs the Inspector of Police