This criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR was dismissed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras as infructuous. The dismissal was based on the submission that the respondent had been acquitted in the subsequent trial.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20-10-2014
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
Crl.O.P.No.24799 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2010
1.Deivathal
2.Vasanthi
3.Lingasamy
4.Duraisamy .. Petitioners
vs.
State Represented by: The Sub Inspector of Police (Special), Moolanur Police Station, Tirupur District (Crime No.745 of 2010) .. Respondent
This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in Crime No.745 of 2010 on the file of the respondent-Police and quash the First Information Report dated 15.10.2010.
The learned Government Advocate has submitted that the trial in C.C.No.243 of 2011 was conducted as against the respondent and ultimately, it ended in acquittal and as such, this original petition has become infructuous. Considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
Crl.OP.24799 of 2010
KSJ (CO)
kk 3/11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the First Information Report dated 15.10.2010 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deivathal
Vasanthi
Lingasamy
Duraisamy
State Represented by The Sub Inspector of Police (Special), Moolanur Police Station
T. Mathivanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
