K. Palani Bava v. Mrs. Sabitha
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition filed for non-compliance with a prior direction is closed in view of compliance with the order and payment of arrears by the respondents during its pendency.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed due to compliance and payment of arrears.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.07.2014
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
CONTEMPT PETITION No.223 of 2014
K.Palani Bava ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. Sabitha
The State of Tamil Nadu
rep. by the Secretary to Government
School Education Department
Fort St. George
Chennai - 600 009.
2. Rameswara Murugan
The Director of School Education (Higher Secondary)
College Road, Nungambakkam
Chennai - 600 006.
3. Sugumar Devadoss
The Chief Educational Officer
Dindigul
Dindigul District. ... Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of
the Contempt of Court Act praying to punish the
contemners/respondents for wilful and deliberate
disobedience and disregard to the Order of this Court in
W.P.No.19641 of 2012, dated 27.7.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thirupathi
For Respondents : Mr.V.Subbiah,
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This Contempt Petition is filed for non-compliance
of the direction issued by this Court in W.P.No.19641 of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2012, dated 27.7.2012, wherein a direction was issued to
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Palani Bava
- respondent
Sabitha
- respondent
Rameswara Murugan
- respondent
Sugumar Devadoss
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court