Contempt petition filed for non-compliance of a High Court direction to grant claim extension. Court closed the petition as the respondent already passed an order rejecting the petitioner's request, allowing petitioner to challenge that order.
Contempt petition closed with liberty to challenge the order of 1.9.2014 passed by the 2nd respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 4.9.2014
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.2106/2014
S.Ganesan : petitioner
versus
1.Sabitha, I.A.S.,
Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai 600 009.
2. Rajeshwaran Murugan,
Director of Elementary Education,
College road, Chennai 6. : respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act to punish the respondents for wilfully
disobeying the orders of the court dated 1.7.2011 in
W.P.No.15810 of 2011.
For Mr.S.Vijayan
petitioner
For Ms.A.Sri Jayanthi, Spl.G.P.
respondents
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed for the non compliance of the direction given by this Court in W.P.No.15810 of 2011, dated 1.7.2011, giving direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner, seeking extension of G.O.Ms.No.210 (School Education Department) dated 14.8.2009, to him, within a period of
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ four months.
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is maintainable when an order rejecting the petitioner's claim was already passed by the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Ganesan
Sabitha
Rajeshwaran Murugan
N. Paul Vasanthakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
