N.Palanivelu v. v.Natarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court held that nothing survives for adjudication in the contempt petition due to belated compliance with the impugned order and allowed the petitioner to challenge that order if advised.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed. No costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN
Contempt Petition No.1279 of 2014
N. Palanivelu
rep. by its Founder and Managing Trustee
Sri Baba Educational Trust
No.16, Vandikaran Street
Velacherry
Chennai-600 042. ..Petitioner
Vs
Mr.V. Natarajan
(Deputy Registrar incharge as Registrar)
The Registrar
Trade Mark Registry
Government of India
Intellectual Property Building
G.S.T. Road
Guindy
Chennai-600 032. ..Respondent
Prayer:- Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent for
wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in
W.P.No.19907 of 2013 dated 27.08.2013
For petitioner : Mr.R.S.Mohan For Respondent : Mr.K. Govi Ganesan --------------
O R D E R
This matter is posted today for reporting compliance.
2
- The learned counsel for the respondent has
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petitioner should be punished for wilful disobedience of the impugned order given the subsequent compliance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N. Palanivelu
- petitioner
Sri Baba Educational Trust
- respondent
V. Natarajan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court