Disposed
M.Thilagam v. D.Sabitha I.A.S
Madras HCCONT P/1175/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A contempt petition filed for wilful disobedience of a court order was disposed of as the respondents produced records showing the petitioner was appointed as a typist following the earlier direction.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed on the record of the petitioner's appointment as Typist.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 26.08.2014
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
¶6
CONTEMPT PETITION No.1175 of 2014
¶7
L.Geetha
¶8
.. Petitioner
¶9
vs
¶10
- C.Sangaranarayanan Chief Engineer cum Principal Director, Highways Department Chepauk, Post Box.432 Chennai 600 005.
¶11
- M.Periyaraj Director General Highways Department Chennai.
¶12
.. Respondents
¶13
2nd respondent impleaded as per order of court dated 25.11.2013 in Sub Application No.716 of 2013 in Cont.Petition No.1175 of 2012
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
L.Geetha
- respondent
C.Sangaranarayanan
- respondent
M.Periyaraj
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court