Tmt Saradammal v. Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-stage order deals with a petition for restoration of a Second Appeal. The Court notes that a prior application (CMP.No.167/2014) was already ordered for final hearing, rendering the current petition unnecessary. The Court closed the new application as a redundant filing.
What did the court decide?
The application CMP.No.384/2014 is closed as unnecessary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.No.384/2014 in
S.A.No.1505/1990
RMDJ
The Application in CMP.No.167 of 2014 for restoration was already ordered by this Court on 20.06.2014 and Registry was directed to post the matter for final hearing on 04.07.2014. Despite to that, this petition is filed for restoration of the Second Appeal once again. Learned Counsel for the Respondent has also filed the Counter affidavit.
Hence, CMP.No.384/2014 was filed for restoration is unnecessary and the same is closed.
12/12/2014
kal/cs
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal is to be restored after a failed restoration attempt through a prior application which was recognized by the Court.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court