registered at Sub-Registrar Office, Mailam. The said property originally belonged to his father S.Ramakrishnan. Since the appellant was wrongly advised by a retired officer that to get loan from any Bank, he should acquire the property only by a sale deed, he instead of getting the property by way of settlement deed has requested his father and his sister to execute a sale deed with the help of a document writer viz., K.Selvaraj, who prepared the said document of sale. The sale deed was prepared only on Hundred Rupees non Judicial Stamp papers (five in number). The 3rd respondent collected the fees of Rs.15,500/- under Sections 41 & 42 of the Stamp Act, as additional stamp duty, by fixing the total value of the property at Rs. 2 lakhs. The original sale deed viz., Document No.384/2008, with endorsement, was handed over to the appellant on 05.02.2008 by the 3rd respondent. While so, during the first week of April, 2008, when the appellant was away from his residence, the 3rd respondent came to the residence of the appellant and collected the original sale deed from the aged parents of the appellant, stating that after making some corrections in the sale deed, he would redeliver the same to the appellant. But, after collecting the original sale deed, the 3rd respondent referred the matter to the 1st respondent under Section 47-A of the Stamp Act. Hence, the appellant gave a complaint to the District Registrar, but, the appellant did not receive any reply or response from the District Registrar. Thereafter, the appellant herein has filed a writ petition in W.P.No.13660 of 2008 for a mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to release the original sale deed viz, Document No.384 of 2008. When the said writ petition came up for hearing on 01.07.2008, before the learned Single Judge, it was represented by the learned Government Advocate as if after the presentation of the document, the petitioner has not even approached the respondents and further, it was represented by the learned Government Advocate that if the appellant comes forward to receive the document, the respondents are ready to release the document. Hence, by recording the said submissions of the learned Government Advocate, the said writ petition was disposed of, as no further orders are required.
