Writ petition under Article 226 challenging loading procedures at a stockyard was disposed of as the petitioner withdrew the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.11.2013
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P(MD)No.16744 of 2013
Dindigul District Sand Tipper Lorry Association, rep. by its Secretary, 83, Fathima Complex, Nehruji Nagar, Near State Bank, Dindigul. .. Petitioner Vs.
1.The District Collector, Trichy District.
2.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, (Water Resources), Trichy District.
3.M.Palanichamy .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 & 2 to regulate the loading procedure in the 3rd respondent stockyard by considering the petitioner's representation, dated 21.09.2013.
For petitioner : Mr.M.R.Vijayakumar
For respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, 1 & 2 Addl. Government Pleader
ORDER
As per the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(Crl.side)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+2CC to M/s.C.S.Associates, Advocate in SR.No.55384
W.P(MD)No.16744 of 2013 11.11.2013
gcg
PBK 26/11/2013 1P/5C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dindigul District Sand Tipper Lorry Association, rep. by its Secretary
District Collector, Trichy District
Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, (Water Resources), Trichy District
M. Palanichamy
S. Nagamuthu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
