M.P. Anitha v. G. Muthukumar
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2013…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2013 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH
Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.14 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013
M.P.Anitha : Petitioner/Petitioner
vs.
G.Muthukumar : Respondent/ Respondent
PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to withdraw G.W.O.P.No.51 of 2012, pending on the file of the Second Additional District Court, Thiruchirappalli and to transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Madurai, in order to try the same along with H.M.O.P.No.153 of 2012 pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sivasubramanian For Respondent : Mr.R.Gandhi For M/s.Ajmal Associates
ORDER
This Petition is filed by the petitioner to withdraw G.W.O.P.No.51 of 2012 pending on the file of the Second Additional District Court, Tiruchirappalli, and to transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Madurai, in order to try the same along with H.M.O.P.No.153 of 2012, pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai.
2
Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed, as the prayer for joint trial is not possible. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. No costs.
Sd/Deputy Registrar
Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Second Additional District Court, Thiruchirappalli.
2.The Judge, The Family Court, Madurai.
+1Cc to Mr.A.Sivasubramanian, Advocate SR.No.33693
+1CC to M/s.Ajmal Associates SR.No.33703
Order made in Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.14 of 2013 Dated:- 04.07.2013
sml
NA/15/07/2013/P2/5C
M.P.Anitha
G.Muthukumar
R.Karuppiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court