Balakrishnan v. R.Janaki
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court allowed a Civil Revision Petition, holding that in a suit for specific performance involving a subsequent sale, the subsequent purchaser and their grantor are necessary and proper parties to ensure decree execution.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order was set aside and the trial court directed to implead 7th and 8th respondents as defendants 7 and 8 in the suit.
What the court decided
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether respondents 7 and 8 are proper and necessary parties to be impleaded in a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of the same property.
Whether the Civil Revision Petitioner is entitled to be allowed to implead subsequent purchasers to secure an executable decree.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balakrishnan
- respondent
R.Janaki
- respondent
R.Jayabalan
- respondent
A.Manickam
- respondent
K.Indirani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court