This revision petition challenged an order refusing to order further investigation. The High Court Bench relied on precedents establishing that courts cannot order further investigation at the instance of a defacto complainant and dismissed the revision at admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.12.2013
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN
CRL.R.C.(MD) No. 833 of 2013
Thirumurugesh ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State The Inspector of Police, Vengamedu Police Station, Karur District Crime No.944/2010 ... Respondent/Complainant 2.Senthil 3.Anand 4.Thangamani 5.Panneer 6.Ulaganathan 7.Prakash 8.Subramani @ Jella 9.Balaji 10.Sooriyamoorthy 11.Manivel 12.Muthukumar 13.M.N.Mohanprakash 14.Sakthi Coach Natarajan 15.Visa Shanmugam ..Respondents/Respondents/Accused
Prayer: Criminal revision petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the order passed by the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Karur, in Cr.M.P.No.29 of 2012 in S.C.No.10 of 2012 dated 13.08.2012 and order further investigation to the first respondent and pass such other orders as this Court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of this case.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh For R1 : Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate For R2 to R15 : Mr.R.Arvind Raj
O R D E R
This revision is filed against the order passed by the learned Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Karur, in Cr.M.P.No.29 of 2012 in S.C.No.10 of 2012 dated 13.08.2012 refusing to order further investigation to the first respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the impugned order passed by the lower Appellate Court.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(T&P)
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.833 of 2013 11.12.2013
ses
PA/06.01.2014/2P/6C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further investigation can be ordered at the instance of the defacto complainant when the impugned order refuses such instruction.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Om Prakash Narang and another Vs. State (Delhi Administration)Referred¶15
AIR 1979 SC 1791 · Who else cites this
E.Jeevan Kumar Vs. State and anotherReferred¶15
2011 Crl.L.J. 418
V.Rajan Vs. State rep. By Inspector of Police, Othakkadai Police Station, MaduraiReferred¶15
Crl.R.C.No. 493 of 2011
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thirumurugesh
The State represented by the Inspector of Police, Vengamedu Police Station, Karur District
Senthil
Anand
Thangamani
Panneer
Aruna Jagadeesan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
