V.Prabu v. the Director
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition seeking directions to register a case. The matter was listed for dismissal due to the petitioner's non-appearance, resulting in the dismissal of the petition for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The criminal original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.08.2013
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9854 of 2013 V.Prabu :Petitioner/Complainant Vs. State rep. by 1.The Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, P.B.No.487 NCB 21 PS Kumarasamy Salai, Chennai.
2.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli.
3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, No.16/53a/1 Masilamani Nagar, Near Central Jail, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.
4.The Inspector of Police,
Vigilance and Anti Corruption, No.16/53a/1 Masilamani Nagar, Near Central Jail, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli. :Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case against the complaint dated 02.05.2013 sent by the petitioner and investigate into the same.
For Petitioner :No Appearance For Respondents :Mr.K.anbarasan
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal original petition should be allowed or dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Prabu
- respondent
State represented by The Director, Vigilance and Anti Corruption
- respondent
The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli
- respondent
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption
- respondent
The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court