In a petition for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court rejected the bail application. The Court cut short the proceedings after noting that the petitioner was detained under Act 14 of 1982, closing the file but allowing a subsequent remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Second day of October Two Thousand Thirteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM
CRL OP(MD) No.16200 of 2013
RAJAN @ CHANTHAI RAJAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SUCHINDRUM POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.1061/2011
... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.C.RAJA KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mrs. S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate[Crl side] that the petitioner stands detained as Goonda Under Act, 14, 1982, this petition stands closed. However the petitioner shall be at liberty to subsequently move for a relief.
sd/-
22/10/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.16200 of 2013
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :22/10/2013 1P/5C RPB 25.10.2013
RAJAN @ CHANTHAI RAJAN
THE STATE
C.T.Selvam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
