Allowed

Vanumamalai v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Aug 2013CRL OP(MD)/13389/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing charges of sand theft. The court noted the petitioner's clean record, lack of interference in investigation, and claim of innocence before imposing standard reporting and bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioner ordered to execute a bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount and report daily to the Magistrate.

Vanumamalai Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2013)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirteenth day of August Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

¶2

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA

¶3

CRL OP(MD) No.13389 of 2013

¶4

VANUMAMALAI ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

¶5

¶6

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR. NO. 215/2013. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶7

For Petitioner : M/S.D.VENKATESH Advocate

¶8

For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶9

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶10

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶11

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 (Sand theft) of I.P.C., in Crime No.215 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police and hence seeks anticipatory bail.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was charged under Sections 379 (Sand theft) of I.P.C. He further submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail.

¶13

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that there is no previous case is pending against the petitioner and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application.

¶14

Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that there is no previous case is pending against the petitioner and even though, the petitioner was not arrested neither he interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

¶15

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Court concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶16

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/-

¶17

13/08/2013

¶18

/ TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO

¶20

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI.

¶21

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUNELVELI.

¶22

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶23

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶24

+1. CC to M/S.D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.40477 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13389 of 2013 Date :13/08/2013

¶25

NA/16/08/2013/P2/6C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vanumamalai v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vanumamalai v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Dhanapal Vs the Inspector of Police

Sithan @ Sivaperumal Vs the Inspector of Police

Stalin Vs the Inspector of Police

Karthikeyan Vs the Inspector of Police

K. Prabhu @ Prabakaran Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Kannan Vs the Inspector of Police