Allowed

Karthikmurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Aug 2013CRL OP(MD)/13371/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 294(b), 341, 324, and 307 of I.P.C. The court considered that the injured was discharged and investigation was considerably over, with no interference by petitioners during the pendency.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on execution of bond for Rs.10,000 with two sureties; must report daily at 10.30 AM and appear before Magistrate within 15 days.

Karthikmurugan Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2013)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Nineteenth day of August Two Thousand Thirteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.13371 of 2013

¶6

1 KARTHIKMURUGAN

¶7

2 MURUGANDI 3 BALASUBRAMANIAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED(A1, A2, A4)

¶8

THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOODAL PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT, CR.NO. 330/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.K.MARIYAPPAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶12

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 341, 324 and 307 of I.P.C., in Crime No.330 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 294(b), 341, 324 and 307 of I.P.C. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail.

¶14

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side)would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application.

¶15

Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is considerably over and even though the petitioners were not arrested, neither they interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

¶16

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai and on each executing a bond for a sum https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court

¶17

concerned daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶18

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶19

sd/19/08/2013

¶20

/ TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO

¶22

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV,MADURAI

¶23

2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MADURAI

¶24

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶25

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶26

KOODAL PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT

¶27

+1. CC to M/S.K.MARIYAPPAN Advocate SR.No.40994 AA/22.08.2013/2p - 6c/

¶28

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13371 of 2013 Date :19/08/2013

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Karthikmurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karthikmurugan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Kumaragurubran @ Vs the Sub - Inspector of Police

P.Gomathi Vs the Superintendent of Police

Ravi @ Akran Vs the Inspector of Police

Jothi Pandi Vs the Inspector of Police

Abdul Razack Vs the Inspector of Police

Kavitha Vs the Inspector of Police