Allowed

Arumugam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Aug 2013CRL OP(MD)/13223/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners charged with offences under the Indian Penal Code. The court noted the investigation was advancing and the injured party was discharged. Bail was granted subject to conditions regarding bond execution and appearing before the concerned magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail with conditions of executing a bond, obtaining sureties, and appearing before the Magistrate within 15 days.

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2013)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Twelfth day of August Two Thousand Thirteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.13223 of 2013

¶6

1 ARUMUGAM

¶7

2 POOBALAN 3 VANAMANAL ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED No. 1 to 3

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. CR. NO. 211/2013. ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S.N.MOHIDEEN BASHA Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 506 (ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.211 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police and hence seek anticipatory bail.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners were charged under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays for enlargement on anticipatory bail.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is considerably over and hence, he prays for dismissal of this application.

¶17

Considering the rival submissions made by both sides and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is considerably over and even though the petitioners were not arrested, neither they interfered with the investigation nor absconded from the jurisdiction, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

¶18

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the Court concerned

¶19

daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within

¶21

a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

¶24

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri.

¶25

2.THE Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thirunelveli.

¶26

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

¶27

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANGUNERI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶28

+1. CC to M/S.N.MOHIDEEN BASHA Advocate SR.No.40277.

¶29

TS/12.08.2013/2P-6C

¶30

CRL OP(MD) No.13223 of 2013

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arumugam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arumugam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Andiya Vs the Superintendent of Police

R. Shanmugarasu Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

K.Paulraj Vs the Superintendent of Police

P.Dhanapal Vs the Inspector of Police

Sithan @ Sivaperumal Vs the Inspector of Police

Stalin Vs the Inspector of Police