Petitioner filed a petition for anticipatory bail under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the petition as it was withdrawn, based on an endorsement by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Eleventh day of November Two Thousand Thirteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM
CRL OP(MD) No.13006 of 2013
A.EDWARD ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN
Vs THE STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAKKARAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY, CRIME NO.454/2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.M.SUBASH BABU Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side).
For Intervenor : M/S.SRI BALAJI, Advocate
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/-
11/11/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAKKARAI POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY,
2 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.13006 of 2013
Date :11/11/2013
msm 19.11.2013 P1-3C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.EDWARD
THE STATE
C.T.Selvam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
