Disposed
Keerthana v. the Inspector of Police
Madras HCCRL OP(MD)/10776/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the First day of August Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Ms.Justice R.MALA
CRL OP(MD) No.10776 of 2013
1 KEERTHANA
2 ANAND ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 3
Vs STATE REP BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH,
DINDIGUL, CR.NO.39/2013 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.MAHENDRAPATHY Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/-
01/08/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL,
2 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.10776 of 2013 Date :01/08/2013
NA/06/08/2013/P1/3C
KEERTHANA
ANAND
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL
R.MALA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court