Dismissed

R. Ramalingam, v. the Principal Secretary and

Madras HC11 Oct 2011WP(MD)/10/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a review application under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC regarding a writ petition concerning land usage restrictions. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the review application.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Review Application granted; Review Application dismissed as withdrawn. Nonetheless, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

R. Ramalingam, Vs the Principal… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2011)

¶1

Rev.Aplc.(MD)No.10/2011

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 20.11.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

and

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI

¶8

REV.APLW(MD)No.10 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 of 2011 and 1 & 2 of 2015

¶9

C.Thangavel .. Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.The District Collector, Dindugal.

¶12

2.The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Dindigul.

¶13

3.The Special Thasildar (ADW),

¶14

Land Acquisition, Dindigul.

¶15

4.The Executive Officer, Batlagundu Town Panchayat, Batlagundu.

¶16

5.The Executive Officer, Sevukampatti Panchayat, Nilakkottai Taluk. .. Respondents

¶17

PRAYER : Review Application is filed under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, to review the order in W.P.(MD) No.1202 of 2010 dated 15.07.2010.

¶18

Prayer in WP(MD). 1202 of 2010 :

¶19

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the respondents not to allow the public to use the land in Survey No.1073/1 and 3 of Sevugampatti Village as burning/burial ground forthwith and consequently direct the respondents to direct the public to use the land in S.No.726/3 of Sevugampatti Village only for the said purpose.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Venkatesh For Respondent : Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian Special Government Pleader

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/2

¶23

Rev.Aplc.(MD)No.10/2011

¶24

ORDER

¶25

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ]

¶26

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Review Application. He has filed a memo to that effect and also made necessary endorsement.

¶27

Recording the same, this Review Application is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(Crl Side)

¶30

// True Copy //

¶31

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶32

¶33

To 1.The District Collector, Dindugal.

¶34

2.The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Dindigul.

¶35

3.The Special Thasildar (ADW), Land Acquisition, Dindigul.

¶36

ORDER MADE IN REV.APLW.(MD)No.10 of 2011 20.11.2019

¶37

km(CO) TR(03.12.2019) 2P 4C

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

2/2

R. Ramalingam, v. the Principal Secretary and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Ramalingam, v. the Principal Secretary and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Tvsk Reddy, Vs Union of India

F.Ismail Pillai Annavi, Vs the Additional Chief

Selvi J.Jayalalithaa Vs Central Bureau of

Thiruna Sujatha, Vs the Principal Secretary and

J.Annalakshmi Vs the District Collector

V. Anbalagan Vs the Deputy Transport