G.P.Logesh v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench dismissed two Habeas Corpus petitions. After hearing the detenue and parties, the court recorded her willingness to go with her mother and brother. The court directed the detenue to join her family, imposed a restraint order on both sides, and directed police to accompany the family.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the detenue to go with her mother and brother; police escort provided; parties restrained from future disturbances.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.03.2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI
H.C.P.(MD)Nos.117 and 128 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011
H.C.P.(MD)No.117 of 2011:
G.P.Logesh
... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Karaikudi North Police Station, Karaikudi,Sivagangai District (Crime No.43 of 2011) 3.Gopi
4.The Inspector of Police, Thirukkoranam Police Station, Rajagopalapuram Post,Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: The Habeas Corpus petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenue by name G.P.Pushpa, D/o G.Palanisamy, aged about 20 years, who has been illegally detained by the 3rd respondent and produce her before this Court and set her at liberty.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.P.Logesh
- respondent
Gopi
- petitioner
R.Karthik
- respondent
Annadurai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court