Disposed

Vigilante Services Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh HC16 Mar 2022WP/5799/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition concerning a pending security license application under the PSARA Act, 2005, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh directed respondent authorities to decide the application within 60 days. The court noted it did not express any opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider and decide the application dated 23.05.2019 under Section 7(4) of the PSARA Act, 2005 within 60 days.

Vigilante Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Madhya Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE

¶3

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA ON THE 16^th OF MARCH, 2022

¶4

WRIT PETITION No. 5799 of 2022

¶5

Between:-

¶6

VIGILANTE SERVICES PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE MR. VINEET JAIN S/O MR. UMESH JAIN AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS OCCUPATION LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF VIGILANTE SERVICES PVT. LTD. AT BHOPAL B-91 SWADESH NAGAR NEAR G.B. PANT SCHOOL, BEHIND ASHOKA GARDEN DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

¶7

.....PETITIONER

¶8

(BY SHRI AMIT MISHRA, ADVOCATE )

¶9

AND

¶10

1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

¶11

2. POLICE HEAD QUARTER THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEADQUARTE JEHANGIRABAD, DISTRICTBHOPAL, M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)

¶12

3. STATE INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE AND PERSONAL SECURITY AGENCY THROUGH ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEADQUARTER JAHANGIRABAD BHOPAL MP (MADHYA PRADESH)

¶13

.....RESPONDENTS

¶14

(BY SHRI AJEET RAWAT, GOVT. ADVOCATE )

¶15

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the

¶16

following:

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s) :-

¶19

"A. That, the application submitted under PSARA Act, 2005 ought to be allowed as per Section 7(4);

¶20

B. The full record of the submitted application along with internal note sheet be

¶21

called

¶22

Signature Not Verified

¶23

SAN

¶24

C. Direct respondent for compensation for the delay caused in issuing license for

¶25

which the office is established & the cost incurred for maintenance & for work force

¶26

D. Any other appropriate relief which this Hon'ble Court deems proper and fit in

¶27

the circumstances of the case be granted in favour of the petitioner."

¶28

Digitally signed by ANINDYA SUNDAR MUKHOPADHYAY Date: 2022.03.16 19:28:44 IST

¶29

¶30

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed an application for grant of security license under the provisions of The Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005 but the same is kept pending since 23.05.2019 and has not been considered and decided till date.

¶31

An innocuous prayer is made by the learned counsel for the petitioner to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in terms of Clause 7 (4) of the Act, 2005 as expeditiously as possible. Counsel appearing for the State submits that he has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶32

In such circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to consider and decide the representation dated 23.05.2019 (Annexure P-4) in terms of Clause 7 (4) of the Act, 2005 within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, after giving audience to the petitioner and pass a self contained speaking order and communicate the outcome to the petitioner within the aforesaid period.

¶33

Needless to mention here that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶34

With the aforesaid observation, this petition is disposed of.

¶35

Certified copy as per rules.

¶36

(VISHAL MISHRA) JUDGE

¶37

¶38

Signature Not Verified SAN

¶39

Digitally signed by ANINDYA SUNDAR MUKHOPADHYAY Date: 2022.03.16 19:28:44 IST

Vigilante Services Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vigilante Services Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases