Target Industrial Security Solution Private Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE…
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL ON THE 7th OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 1622 of 2021
BETWEEN:-
TARGET INDUSTRIAL SECURITY SOLUTION PRIVATE PVT. LTD. THR. DIRECTOR PRITI SHUKLA W/O RAJESH SHUKLA PLOT NO. 50, NETAJI HOUSING SOCIETY , GOREWADA NAGPUR (MAHARASHTRA)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI SHREYAS DUBEY, ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR .PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AND ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE LAW AND ORDER AND SECURITY MP POLICE HEADQUARTER JEHANGIRABAD BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI ATUL DWIVEDI, DWIVEDI, PANEL LAWYER FOR THE STATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
ORDER
Signature Not Verified
SAN
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that there exists an alternative statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order under Section 14 of The Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005 and it be directed that in case he files appeal then that be decided on its own merits without adverting to the issue of limitation as on the basis of incorrect legal advice rendered to the petitioner he has spent substantial time before the High Court.
Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN This Petition can be disposed of with a direction that in case petitioner moves an Date: 2022.09.07 19:47:58 IST
2
appropriate application seeking condonation of delay for the time spent by him before this Court then Authority concerned shall consider the petitioner's application and decide it on its own merits in accordance with law and relevant Rules within a period of three months thereof.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the
case.
In above terms, this petition is disposed of.
Signature Not Verified
SAN
Tabish
(VIVEK AGARWAL)
JUDGE
Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2022.09.07 19:47:58 IST
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Target Industrial Security Solution Private Pvt. Ltd. thr. Director Priti Shukla
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court