The learned counsel for the review petitioner pointed out the mistake in the order passed by this Court saying that National Highway-7 though renumbered as National Highway-30, but that has not lost its status of National Highway, therefore, the Court has committed mistake which is apparent on the face of the record and based its judgment on this foundation which is apparently erroneous. He further contended that this Court has also not considered the provisions of the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 (for brevity “Act, 2002”) wherein under Section 34 it is clearly provided that unless notification is issued, the National Highway cannot lose its status merely because there is some change in alignment of the road and due to which bypass road has been constructed. For strengthening his argument, the learned counsel for the review-petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to the observations made in paragraphs 38 and 39 of the order passed by this Court and as such he has argued that the mistake is apparent on the face of the record as the Court has not considered the impact of Section 34 of the
