Dismissed¶25

Abdul Rahim Tharayil, v. the Superintendent

Kerala HC3 Apr 2025WP(C)/17435/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kerala HC Ernakulam; W.P.(C) 17435/2024; Abdul Rahim Tharayil (proprietor, M/s Tharayil Cement Agencies, Malappuram) v. Superintendent, Central Tax & Central Excise, Perinthalmanna Range; dismissed as not pressed on 03.04.2025 (Bechu Kurian Thomas J.) after petitioner availed Amnesty Scheme benefit and filed a memo; no substantive issue decided; no statute or cited case.

What the court decided

AI extract

Abdul Rahim Tharayil, Vs the Superintendent — Kerala HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WP(C) NO. 17435 OF 2024

¶2

¶3

2025:KER:28638

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

¶7

THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947

¶8

WP(C) NO. 17435 OF 2024

¶9

PETITIONER(S) :

¶10

ABDUL RAHIM THARAYIL,
AGED 37 YEARS
PROPRIETOR, M/S. THARAYIL CEMENT AGENCIES,
MP–XI/457-B, GROUND FLOOR, MAIN ROAD,
KOOTILANGADI, MALAPPURAM, PIN – 679 324.

¶11

BY ADVS.
R.SREEJITH
K.KRISHNA
ACHYUTH MENON
PADMANATHAN K.V.

¶12

RESPONDENT(S) :

¶13

THE SUPERINTENDENT,
CENTRAL TAX & CENTRAL EXCISE,
PERINTHALMANNA RANGE, AWWAL TOWER,
MIDDLE HILL, MALAPPURAM, PIN – 676 505.

¶14

BY ADVS.
THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL
SRI.SUVIN R.MENON, CGC
SREELAL WARRIAR

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

WP(C) NO. 17435 OF 2024

¶17

¶18

2025:KER:28638

¶19

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

¶20

......….............................................

¶21

W.P.(C) No.17435 of 2024

¶22

…................................................ Dated this the 3^rd day of April, 2025

¶23

JUDGMENT

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner does not intend to pursue the writ petition, since the petitioner has already availed the benefit under the Amnesty Scheme and a memo to that effect has also bee filed.

¶25

In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed in

¶26

terms of the memo.

¶27

sd/-

¶28

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

¶29

AMV/04/04/2025

Abdul Rahim Tharayil, v. the Superintendent

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Abdul Rahim Tharayil, v. the Superintendent

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.R.Shaji Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

M/S. Exos It Management Private Limited Vs the Assistant Enforcement Officer

Mercy Andrew Vs Chavara Grama Panchayath

C.P. Roy Vs State of Kerala

St. John’S Convent Vs the District Collector

Renjitjha.G.Nair, Vs Municipal Council