Ramesh S.L., v. the Authorized Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Borrower's writ petition against Canara Bank recovery action; petition withdrawn at admission stage and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:KER:27511
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 11TH CHAITHRA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 11951 OF 2025
PETITIONER:
RAMESH S.L.,
AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. LAKSHMANAM,
S L BHAVAN, MARUNGATTUKONAM, KURAKKADA P.O.,
MUTTAPPALAM, AZHOOR, TRIVANDRUM, PIN – 695 104.
BY ADV M.R.SASITH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, THE CANARA BANK, RECOVERY & LEGAL SECTION, REGIONAL OFFICE NORTH, IIND FLOOR, CARMEL TOWERS, OPP. COTTON HILL SCHOOL, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 014.2THE CANARA BANK,
POOJA BUILDING, SARKARA BYPASS ROAD, VALIYAKADA,
CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN – 695 501,
REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
3 THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE CANARA BANK, POOJA BUILDING, SARKARA BYPASS ROAD, VALIYAKADA, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 501.BY ADV. M. GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 01.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) 11951/2025
2
2025:KER:27511
JUDGMENT
When this matter is taken up for consideration today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition will stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/GOPINATH P. JUDGE
ats
Ramesh S.L.
The Authorized Officer, The Canara Bank, Recovery & Legal Section, Regional Office North, Thiruvananthapuram
The Canara Bank, Chirayinkeezhu Branch
The Branch Manager, The Canara Bank, Chirayinkeezhu
Gopinath P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court