Dismissed
Chidambaran v. Chandrika
Kerala HCRSA/1180/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn following a withdrawal petition filed by the appellant's counsel. The order decides nothing of general application.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the appellant.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
2025:KER:26521
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶3
PRESENT
¶4
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
¶5
THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1947
¶6
RSA NO. 1180 OF 2019
¶7
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.08.2019 IN AS NO.179
OF 2013 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT – II, ALAPPUZHA ARISING OUT
OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.08.2013 IN OS NO.55 OF 2019 OF
MUNSIFF COURT,HARIPAD
¶8
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
¶9
CHIDAMBARAN
AGED 68 YEARS
S/O.KESAVAN, ALUMMOOTTIL HOUSE, KALLIKKAD MURI,
ARATTUPUZHA VILLAGE.
¶10
BY ADVS.
S.SANAL KUMAR
SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN
SMT.T.J.SEEMA
¶11
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Chidambaran
- respondent
Chandrika
Coram
AI extract
M.A. Abdul Hakhim
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court