Dismissed¶¶43

Manoj Kumar v. Vinithamol

Kerala HC2 Apr 2025RPFC/38/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RPFC 38/2016; RPFC 458/2018; High Court of Kerala Ernakulam; Judge Kauser Edappagath; Manoj Kumar v. Vinithamol/Vineethamol; Family Court Nedumangad; M.C. No.161/2015 order dated 30.09.2015; M.C. No.476/2017 order dated 31.07.2018; revision petitions dismissed as withdrawn on 02.04.2025 following settlement between the parties; no ratio, no quantum, no statutory or precedential discussion.

What the court decided

AI extract

Manoj Kumar Vs Vinithamol — Kerala HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

R.P.(FC).Nos.38 & 458/2016

¶2

¶3

2025:KER:27934

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

¶7

WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947

¶8

RPFC NO. 38 OF 2016

¶9

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2015 IN MC NO.161 OF
2015 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD

¶10

REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

¶11

MANOJ KUMAR

¶12

S/O PODIYAN, NISHA BHAVAN, VETTIKAVALER,
KAKKODU, KOTTARKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT

¶13

BY ADV SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR

¶14

RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

¶15

VINITHAMOL

¶16

AGED 32 YEARS

¶17

D/O SAHADEVAN, VILAYIL VEEDU, MURIYOORKONAM,
ALANTHARA, NELLANADU, VENJARAMMOODU,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-695607.

¶18

THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY
HEARD ON 02.04.2025, ALONG WITH RPFC.458/2018, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

R.P.(FC).Nos.38 & 458/2016

¶20

¶21

2025:KER:27934

¶22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶23

PRESENT

¶24

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

¶25

WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947

¶26

RPFC NO. 458 OF 2018

¶27

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.07.2018 IN MC NO.476 OF
2017 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD

¶28

REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER:

¶29

MANOJ KUMAR
AGED 43 YEARS
S/O PODIYAN, VETIKKAVILA NISHA NIVAS,
KADUVAPARA, KAKKOD P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM
DISTRICT

¶30

BY ADV J.JAYAKUMAR

¶31

RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

¶32

VINEETHAMOL

¶33

AGED 34 YEARS

¶34

D/O SAHADEVAN, VILAYIL VEEDU, MURIYOORKONAM,
ALANTHARA, NELLANADU, VENJARAMOODU,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695105

¶35

BY ADVS.SRI.V.SURESH
SRI.G.SUDHEER

¶36

THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY
HEARD ON 02.04.2025, ALONG WITH RPFC.38/2016, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶37

R.P.(FC).Nos.38 & 458/2016

¶38

¶39

2025:KER:27934

¶40

ORDER

¶41

It is submitted that the dispute has been settled

¶42

between the parties and the petitioner does not want to proceed further with these revision petitions. Accordingly,

¶43

both the revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶44

Sd/-

¶45

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

¶46

JUDGE

¶47

kp

Manoj Kumar v. Vinithamol

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Manoj Kumar v. Vinithamol

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suhas R Vs Nivas P.M

Biji P Anand Vs the Superintendent of Police

A.A Abdulla Vs Union of India

Sreejith Vs Sajini

Abdul Rahim Vs Arifa Beevi

Thanseer Muhammed Vs Noufiya