Dismissed¶25

Fousiya Beegam v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC4 Apr 2025Crl.MC/3271/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kerala High Court Ernakulam; Crl.MC 3271/2025; 2025:KER:29183; Kauser Edappagath; 04.04.2025; quash final report; Annexure A1; Crime No.256/2022 Valiyamala Police Station Thiruvananthapuram; CC No.940/2022 Judicial Magistrate First Class-I Nedumangad; accused no.2 Fousiya Beegam; de facto complainant Shahida Maheen; IPC Sections 447, 294(b), 341, 323, 506 read with 34; prima facie material; no reason to quash; petition dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The court found that there is prima facie material to attract the offences alleged against the petitioner and therefore saw no reason to quash the proceedings. ¶24

Fousiya Beegam Vs State of Kerala — Kerala HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.M.C.No.3271/2025

¶2

¶3

2025:KER:29183

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

¶7

FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947

¶8

CRL.MC NO. 3271 OF 2025

¶9

CRIME NO.256/2022 OF Valiyamala Police Station,
Thiruvananthapuram
 CC NO.940 OF 2022 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST
CLASS -I,NEDUMANGAD

¶10

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:

¶11

FOUSIYA BEEGAM, D/O ASANARUKANNU, RESIDING AT
SHAHANA COTTAGE, CHULLIMANOOR, AANADU VILLAGE,
NEDUMANGADU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,,
PIN - 695541

¶12

BY ADVS. J.R.PREM NAVAZ SUMEEN S., MUHAMMED SWADIQ M.R.ALPHY GEORGE

¶13

RESPONDENT/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

¶14

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

¶15

2 SHAHIDA MAHEEN, AGED 47 YEARS, D/O SHEREEFA BEEVI, RESIDING AT SHAH NIVAS, YMG ROAD, NORTH JANATHA, PALARIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682025

¶16

SR.C.N.PRABHAKARAN, SR.PP

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:

¶18

Crl.M.C.No.3271/2025

¶19

¶20

2025:KER:29183

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This Crl.M.C has been filed to quash Annexure A1 final

¶23

report in Crime No.256/2022 of Valiyamala Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District.

¶24

The petitioner is the 2^nd accused. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 447, 294(b), 341, 323, and 506 read with 34 of the IPC. There are prima facie material to attract the offences alleged. Hence I see no reason to quash the proceedings.

¶25

Accordingly, the Crl.M.C is dismissed.

¶26

sd/-

¶27

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

kp

¶30

Crl.M.C.No.3271/2025

¶31

¶32

2025:KER:29183

¶33

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3271/2025

¶34

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶35

Annexure A1THE TRUE COPY OF FINAL REPORT/CHARGE
SHEET IN CRIME NO: 256 OF 2022 OF
VALIYAMALA POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶36

Annexure A2THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE
ISSUED IN FORM NO: 6 UNDER SECTION 12
OF THE REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND
DEATHS ACTS, 1969

Fousiya Beegam v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fousiya Beegam v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aneesh Kumar Vs Vijayamma

Shamseer. K. v Vs State of Kerala

Chandran Vs State of Kerala

Dr.Broosh S Puthiyadam Vs Musaif Shan Muhammad

Anwar Sadath Vs State of Kerala

Jijo K John Vs Dayana Santhosh