Soumya Muraleedharan v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch of writ petitions challenged the retrospective commencement of the BUDS Act under Section 1(3), Section 25(3), and the repugnancy of the KPID Act, seeking quashing of deposit-scheme prosecutions. The court held the deemed commencement valid as continuation of the Ordinance, found remaining contentions factual disputes unfit for Article 226 interference, and dismissed all petitions.