Writ petition against Kozhikode Corporation concerning licence renewal was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the matter had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 17TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 789 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
ABDUL GAFOOR. T. T., S/O. IBRAHIM, KARADIPARAMBIL, NELLIKKODE .P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673016
BY ADVS. AVM.SALAHUDIN A.D.DIVYA
RESPONDENTS:
3 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KOZHIKODE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001
BY ADV G.SANTHOSH KUMAR (P).
SRI.V.KRISHNAMENON, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
WP(C)No.789 of 2023
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.
WP(C)No.789 of 2023
Dated this the 7th day of June, 2024
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
JUDGE
dlk/07.06.2024
-3-
WP(C)No.789 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 789/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
| EXHIBIT-P1 | THE TRUE 04/08/2022 ACKNOWLEDG OF LICENCE |
COPY O ISSUED ING THE . |
F THE OF RECEIPT DATED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXHIBIT-P2 | THE TRUE 26/12/2022 ENGINEER, |
COPY ISSUE KOZHIKOD |
OF THE NOTICE DATED D BY THE EXECUTIVE E CORPORATION. |
| EXHIBIT-P3 | PHOTOGRAPH | OF THE | HOTEL PREMISES. |
| EXHIBIT-P4 | PHOTOGRAPH | OF THE | HOTEL PREMISES. |
| EXHIBIT-P5 | PHOTOGRAPH | OF THE | HOTEL PREMISES. |
Abdul Gafoor T.T.
Kozhikode Corporation
Secretary, Kozhikode Corporation
Executive Engineer, Kozhikode Municipal Corporation
Mohammed Nias C.P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
