Disposed

O.J. Kuruvilla v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC21 Mar 2024WP(C)/7665/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew writ petition disputing land acquisition notice on admission, submitting he has no property in the affected area. Court accepted submission and closed the writ petition. The respondents admitted the original notice was issued by mistake and a revised notice is being issued. No substantive legal ruling.

What did the court decide?

Petition is closed; no revision on merits was granted or denied as the petition was withdrawn.

O.J. Kuruvilla Vs State of Kerala — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 21^ST DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1946

¶5

WP(C) NO. 7665 OF 2022

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

O.J. KURUVILLA AGED 74 YEARS SON OF. OLIYAPURATH JOSEPH, OLIYAPURATH HOUSE, RAMALLOOR BLOCK OFFICE, KOTHAMANGALAM, , ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686691

¶8

BY ADVS.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM, MARIYA P KOTTAM, ARJUN S BENEDICT AJMAL AHMED R. JOSEPH P P

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 695001

¶11

2 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER'S OFFICE, PWD ROAD DIVISION, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN - 686673

¶12

3 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD ROAD SUB DIVISION, KOTHAMANGALAM PWD ROAD SUB DIVISION, KOTHAMANGALAM, PIN - 685603

¶13

4 DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN -682030

¶14

5 DISTRICT SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 68030

¶15

6 TALUK SURVEYOR TALUK OFFICE KOTHAMANGALAM, FOURTH FLOOR, REVENUE TOWER,SH 16, KOTHAMANGALAM, PIN - 686666

¶16

7 TAHSILDAR KOTHAMANGALAM, FOURTH FLOOR, REVENUE TOWER, SH 16, KOTHAMANGALAM, PIN - 686691

¶17

8 ADDL.R8:BOBY P. JOSEPH, S/O.JOSEPH, AGED 54 POTHANIKKATTU HOUSE, MALAYINKEEZHU, KOTHAMANGALAM, PIN-686 691. (AS PER ORDER DATED 08-06-2022 IN IA I/2022.)

¶18

BY ADVS. ALEXANDER JOSEPH SPL. GP JAFFAR KHAN

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

¶20

21.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

W.P.(C). No.7665 of 2022

: 2 :

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

W.P.(C) No.7665 of 2022

¶26

¶27

Dated this the 21^st day of March, 2024

¶28

JUDGMENT

¶29

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the above writ petition, since the petitioner has no property in Keerampara Village, for which the notice has been issued.

¶30

The learned Government Pleader – Revenue upon instructions submitted that in fact the notice was issued by a mistake and that a revised notice is being issued.

¶31

Recording the above said submissions, the writ petition is closed.

¶32

Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

¶33

sm/

¶34

: 3 :

¶35

W.P.(C). No.7665 of 2022

¶36

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7665/2022

¶37

PETITIO	NER EXHIBITS
Exhibit	P1	THE NO.2	TRUE COPY OF 257/2012 OF KO	THE SALE DEED THAMANGALAM SRO	BEARING
Exhibit	P2	THE	TRUE COPY O	F TAX RECEIPT	SHOWING
		PAYM 2020	ENT OF PROPE -21	RTY TAX FOR TH	E YEAR
Exhibit	P3	THE	POSSESSION CE	RTIFICATE ISSUED	BY THE
		VILL	AGE OFFICER	TO THE PETIT	IONER'S
		PROP 05.0	ERTY HAVING 2.2021	0.66 ARES	DATED
Exhibit	P4	THE	BUILDING TAX	RECEIPT SHOWING	PAYMENT
		OF PROP	BUILDING TAX ERTY	FOR THE PETIT	IONER'S
Exhibit	P5	THE EXEC	TRUE COPY OF T UTIVE ENGINEER	HE NOTICE ISSUED DATED 25.02.2022	BY THE
Exhibit	P6	THE THE DATE	TRUE COPY OF PETITIONER BE D 05.03.2022	THE REPLY SUBMIT FORE THE 2ND RES	TED BY PONDENT
Exhibit	P7	THE 23.0	TRUE COPY OF 2.2020 BEARING	THE NOTIFICATION SRO NO. 161/2020	DATED
RESPOND	ENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit	R8 (g)	TRUE OF K	TYPED COPY O OTHAMANGALAM S	F DOCUMENT NO.12 RO	00/1124
EXHIBIT	R2(a)	TRUE 17.1	COPY OF 1.2021 IN WP(C	THE JUDGMENT ) NO. 22729/2021.	DATED
EXHIBIT	R2(b)	TRUE (LR)	COPY OF THE DATED 17.02.2	REPORT OF THE TA 022 ALONG WITH SK	HSILDAR ETCH.
EXHIBIT	R2(c)	TRUE	COPY OF THE	REPORT OF THE TA	HSILDAR
		DATE NOTI	D 11.02.2022 CE.	ALONG WITH F	ORM 6
EXHIBIT	R2(d)	TRUE	COPY OF	THE WRITTEN OB	JECTION
		SUBM 05.0	ITTED BY T 3.2022.	HE PETITIONER	DATED
EXHIBIT	R2(e)	TRUE NO.	COPY OF THE 108/2023 DATED	ORDER IN CONTEMP 15.09.2023.	T CASE

O.J. Kuruvilla v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

O.J. Kuruvilla v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adv. V.S. Suresh Kumar Vs State of Kerala

P.T.P. Kunhamina Vs the State of Kerala

Rajesh Kumar K. T. Vs 1. State of Kerala represented by its Secretary to Registration Department

Pramod Vs State of Kerala

Kunhi Thampatty P.K ( Ambadi Kovilagam Valiya Thamburatty ) Vs the District Collector

Binu Damodaran Vs State of Kerala