Dismissed

P.a.Kabeer v. the Chairman

Kerala HC5 Jun 2024WP(C)/7288/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition concerning traffic regulation and parking issues before Ottapalam Municipality authorities was dismissed as not pressed after the petitioner's counsel stated the matter was no longer being pursued.

What the court decided

AI extract

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1946

¶5

WP(C) NO. 7288 OF 2019

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

P.A.KABEER
AGED 51 YEARS
S/O AHAMMED HAJI,
K.V.M.MANZIL P.O.MANKARA,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADVS.
P.JAYARAM
SARATH CHANDRAN K.B.

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 THE CHAIRMAN

¶11

TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE,
OTTAPALAM MUNICIPALITY,
P.O.OTTAPALAM- 679 102.

¶12

P.a.Kabeer Vs the Chairman — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2024)

¶32

`PETITIONER EXHIBITS`
`EXHIBIT P1` `TRUE COP`	`Y OF THE JUDGMENT DATED`
`21.11.208` `COURT OF K`	`IN WPC NO 2514/2018, HIGH` `ERALA.`
`EXHIBIT P2` `TRUE COPY` `DATED 24.` `TRAFFIC R` `MUNICIPALI` `OTTAPALAM`	`OF THE LETTER NO C1-2458/18` `12.2018 ISSUED BY CHAIRMAN,` `EGULATORY COMMITTEE OTTAPALAM` `TY TO HEALTH SUPERVISOR,` `MUNICIPALITY.`
`EXHIBIT P3` `TRUE COPY` `17.1.2019` `BEFORE THE`	`OF THE COMPLAINT DATED` `SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER` `RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4`
`EXHIBIT P3` `TRUE COPY` `17.1.2019` `BEFORE THE`	`OF THE COMPLAINT DATED` `SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER` `RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4`
`EXHIBIT P3` `TRUE COPY` `ISSUED TO` `MUNICIPALI`	`OF THE RECEIPT DATED 17.1.2019` `THE PETITIONER FROM OTTAPALAM` `TY WITH REFERENCE TO EXT P3`
`COMPLAINT` `RESPONDENT`	`FILED BEFORE THE 2ND`
`EXHIBIT P3` `TRUE COPY` `17.1. 2019`	`OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED` `SHOWING POSTAGE OF EXHIBIT P3`
`COMPLAINT` `(TRAFFIC)`	`TO SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE` `OTTAPALAM`
`EXHIBIT P3` `TRUE COPY` `17.1.2019` `COMPLAINT` `OFFICER OT`	`OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED` `SHOWING POSTAGE OF EXHIBIT P3` `TO JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT` `TAPALAM`
`EXHIBIT P4` `TRUE COPY`	`OF THE STATEMENT DATED`
`2.7.2018`	`SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF THE`
`OTTAPALAM` `2514/2018`	`MUNICIPALITY IN WPC NO` `HIGH COURT OF KERALA`
`EXHIBIT P5` `PHOTOGRAPH`	`S SHOWING THE PARKING OF`
`AUTORIKSHA` `PETITIONER`	`WS BLOCKING THE WAY TO` `S HYPER MARKET.`

P.a.Kabeer v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sadasivan Vs State of Kerala

P.N.Eswaran Vs the Secretary, Manjoor Grama Panchayat

R.Thulasi Vs State of Kerala

Yakoob N.K. Vs the Land Revenue Commissioner

P.a.Kabeer v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sadasivan Vs State of Kerala

P.N.Eswaran Vs the Secretary, Manjoor Grama Panchayat

R.Thulasi Vs State of Kerala

Yakoob N.K. Vs the Land Revenue Commissioner

A compact analysis

Coram

M.S. Viswanathan Vs the District Collector