Renuka Madhu v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition became infructuous. The Court dismissed the writ petition accordingly on 15.07.2024.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 24TH ASHADHA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 31659 OF 2015
PETITIONER:
RENUKA MADHU AGED 44 YEARS
W/O. MADU, JALIPALVILAYIL MAYALAYAM, VENMONY MURI, VENMONY VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.AJITH MURALI
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
- 2 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Renuka Madhu
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Deputy Director of Panchayath Local Self Government
- respondent
Venmony Grama Panchayath
- respondent
Secretary, Venmony Grama Panchayath
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court