Mansoor Ali v. the Canara Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition as he could not comply with interim order directions; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 30TH MAGHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 2777 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
MANSOOR ALI
AGED 43 YEARS, MANSOOR ALI,
S/O VEERAN, MADATHIL HOUSE,
EDAPATTA, MALAPPURAM,
PIN – 679 326.
BY ADV ARUN ASHOK
RESPONDENTS:
1THE CANARA BANK LTD.
EDAPATTA BRANCH, MKM COMPLEX,
OPP. ARAFA HOSPITAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, PIN – 679 575.
2 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
THE CANARA BANK LTD., EDAPATTA BRANCH,
MKM COMPLEX, OPP. ARAFA HOSPITAL,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 679 575.
BY ADVS.
GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR M, STANDING COUNSEL
K.JOHN MATHAI(K/413/1984)
JOSON MANAVALAN(J-526)
KURYAN THOMAS(K/131/2003)
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM(MAH/58/2006)
RAJA KANNAN(K/356/2008)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 19.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.2777 of 2024
: 2 :
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 19th day of February, 2024
Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner could not comply with the directions of this Court as per the interim order dated 25.01.2024. The petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH JUDGE
AMR
Mansoor Ali
The Canara Bank Ltd., Edapatta Branch
The Authorised Officer, The Canara Bank Ltd., Edapatta Branch
N.Nagareth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court