Proprietor sought to challenge bank recovery proceedings but counsel stated the petitioner did not wish to prosecute the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, deciding nothing on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 24TH MAGHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 2734 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
RAMESH C., AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. CHANDRAN PROPRIETOR, M/S. ARJUN METALS DOOR NO. 7/514 NH 47 MARUTHAROAD P.O, PALAKKAD PIN – 678007, RESIDING AT GIRI NIVAS NARIKKODE, CHANDRA NAGAR P.O PALAKKAD, PIN – 678007.
BY ADVS. ALIAS M.CHERIAN K.M.RAPHY BRISTO S PARIYARAM AMEERA JOJO MINNU DARWIN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER DOOR NO. 733/2, 1ST FLOOR, D AND D ARCADE CHITTUR ROAD, MANAPULLIKKAVU, KUNNATHURMEDU P.O, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678013 2 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK, DOOR NO. 733/2, 1ST FLOOR, D & D ARCADE CHITTUR ROAD, MANAPULLIKKAVU KUNNATHURMEDU P.O, PALAKKAD, PIN – 678013
BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL SHANKAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.2734/2024
: 2 :
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 13th day of Februar y, 2024
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH
JUDGE
SR
RAMESH C.
THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK
N.NAGARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
